Social Studies
Social Studies, 05.08.2019 19:30, albattatasraap5wymy

Andrew went to hear a speech by a community leader he very much admired. he took a notebook and pen and, during the speech, wrote down everything he could from the speech. when he got home later, he reviewed his notes and could barely make sense out of them. what went wrong? a. andrew should have simply listened to the speech rather than taking notes. b.andrew should have taken notes by making a full-sentence outline of the speech. c.andrew should have paid more attention to the speaker’s delivery rather than focusing on the words of the speech. d.andrew should have resisted distractions and concentrated more effectively on the speech. e.andrew should have made a key-word outline of the speech instead of trying to write down everything

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 12:30, CodyJ4503
20 measure the distance from russia's westernmost border in 1914 to the western border under bolshevik control in october 1919.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:10, eggoysters
Who did not believe that land could not be owned
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:31, Carly9189
Science cannot describe things that a.) are beyond imagination, experience, or human ability b.) cannot be observed, measured, or tested c.) have not been conclusively proven d.) occur without being seen, heard, or felt
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:30, nickname9154
Donald was arrested for murdering an acquaintance. at the trial, donald takes the stand and testifies that he and the victim knew each other. he admits that they would drink and use drugs together. one night while partying, donald explains in his testimony, an argument got out of hand during a card game. donald explains that the victim accused him of cheating and pulled out a knife on him and started swinging it in the air. donald said that he had no choice but to pull out his gun and shoot the victim. the jury convicted donald of manslaughter. who would argue that donald weighed the potential costs and benefits of shooting the victim and decided to pull the trigger as a result of free will? a. a rational choice theorist b. a critical criminologist c. a conflict theorist d. a positivist
Answers: 3
Do you know the correct answer?
Andrew went to hear a speech by a community leader he very much admired. he took a notebook and pen...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Health, 11.09.2019 22:30
Konu
Mathematics, 11.09.2019 22:30