Gary spends much of his day wondering “what if” about catastrophic scenarios. this thought process makes him feel he has control over the situation. however, the lack of any catastrophes only reinforces the “what if? ” behavior. gary would most likely be diagnosed with: (a) obsessive compulsive disorder.(b) major depression(c) generalized anxiety disorder(d) social anxiety disorder

The correct answer is C. Generalized anxiety disorder

Explanation:

In psychology, the general anxiety disorder is a type of disorder in which the individual shows an excessive worry or anxiety that is persistent about different issues such as family, job or future. This is classified as a disorder because the individual is unable to control his anxiety and because of this, it ic common individuals with this disorder have persistent thoughts about the situation or issue that causes anxiety. This differs from obsessive-compulsive disorder because this focuses on persistent and repetitive behaviors, from major depression because this involves persistent sadness and from social anxiety disorder because in this anxiety is triggered by social situations.

Considering this, Gary is likely to be diagnosed with Generalized anxiety disorder because he has an excessive and persistent worry about future and this makes him think all the time about possible catastrophic scenarios which shows he is unable to control this though and he has an irrational worry which is part of this disorder.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

yes

it is because 3 because the citizen the northern democratic party watned the warning on red to blue because it is purple. lol