It is easy to forget that social institutions are not immune to massive change. at the start of the nineteenth century, houses of confinement winked out of existence in europe. houses of confinement were designed to be places that would not only receive but also imprison the poor. evaluated by their functional value, the establishment of the houses of confinement may be considered as a failure. in several hundred years what institutions that at present seem to be permanent fixtures in society will share a similar fate?

Highlight ideas in this passage that show why the anti-federalists objected to the constitution. if it were possible to consolidate the states, and preserve the features of a free government . . [w]ealth, offices, and the benefits of government would collect in the center: and the extreme states . . become much less important. . i still believe a complete federal bill of rights to be very practicable. which reasons below explain why the anti-federalists objected to the constitution? check all that apply power would be too centralized. a bill of rights was included. states would become less powerful. a bill of rights was not included. states would become more powerful.