Social Studies
Social Studies, 23.07.2019 03:20, microwave13016

Ahomeowner entered into a written agreement with a contractor whereby the contractor agreed to completely remodel the homeowner's bathroom "to her specifications" at a cost of $10,000. the homeowner's specifications were highly detailed and required custom-made fixtures that would not be usable in other bathroom remodeling jobs. the contractor ordered the custom-made fixtures and paid $4,000 for them when they were delivered to his place of business. figuring up the cost of the fixtures and labor, the contractor estimated that he would make a total profit of $2,000 on the job after payment for materials and workers. before the contractor began work on the project, but after he had paid for the fixtures, the homeowner told the contractor that she had had a change of heart and would probably be selling the house the following year, and so would not need a custom bathroom. the contractor made no attempt to sell the fixtures to another contractor and filed suit against the homeowner for damages. what is the contractor likely to recover? a nothing, because he failed to mitigate damages. b his expectation damages of $2,000.c $4,000, the cost of materials as restitution. d $2,000 as expectation damages, + $4,000 in reliance damages.

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 05:30, WritingStar1313
If a swimmer is traveling at a constant speed of 0.85 m/s, how long would it take to swim the length of a 50m olympic sized pool?
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:40, blink182lovgabbie
Explain why the judicial branch is considered the weakest branch. explain what might happen if the judicial branch could not separate itself from the other two branches. explain how a strong judiciary branch would maintain limited government and individual rights. explain why a law that contradicts the constitution must be ruled invalid. explain why the legislature may not determine if its laws are unconstitutional. hamilton argues that the judicial branch is not above the legislative branch. explain his reasoning. how is the problem solved when two laws passed by the same legislature contradict each other? explain why hamilton believes it is pointless to argue the power of judicial review will enable judges to rule in ways that serve their own interests. explain how life tenure is necessary for the judicial branch to be able to protect individual rights against a majority. explain how everyone benefits when the rights of individuals or groups are protected. explain how limited terms of office might discourage the best-qualified people.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:30, ldelgado97
What attorney successfully defended zenger during trail
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:00, adelheidclees
Which gold led israelis and palestinians into conflict
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Ahomeowner entered into a written agreement with a contractor whereby the contractor agreed to compl...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 03.01.2022 06:00