Carl gives a formal presentation to his team members about the new software that he has recently reviewed. he feels that it will be very useful for his team and will increase efficiency. however, some members of the team disagree with carl and argue that it could lead to a decrease in productivity. carl, irritated at being challenged, feels that the team members are making excuses for being lazy. in the context of this scenario, carl’s judgment has been influenced by multiple choice his perception. groupthink. social facilitation effect. noise. his self-efficacy.

The united states economy is one in which producers are generally free to produce what they want and consumers are free to purchase what they desire, so long as no laws are broken. at the same time, however, the government does regulate some aspects of the economy. the u. s. can best be described as which of the following a mixed economy b liberated economy c command economy d market economy

Identify the example of when situation and time are key to assessing risk of harm in a research study: a study on the efficacy of a behavioral intervention for smoking cessation involves both adults and teenagersasking women if they have had an abortionresearch on the prevalence of hiv-infected individuals in communitiesa survey about sexually transmitted diseases

Asociologist wants to study a culture that occurs in some women’s prisons: “state families,” in which individual prisoners take on certain roles within a group of like-minded prisoners. there is previous evidence that younger prisoners will use older inmates who play the roles of grandparents as a resource before they will turn to staff for and advice. the lieutenant in charge of a dorm of long-term prisoners offers to gather volunteers to speak to the researcher and also offers to vouch for the integrity of the researcher. the use of this staff is: a valid use of a statistical technique referred to “snowball sampling” wherein the inclusion of the first subject leads to the recruitment of another one subject. a useful tactic in obtaining a sample of prisoners who both meet the criteria and who will be honest with the researcher. wrong and is prohibited; subject selection needs to be free from intervention by prison authorities or prisoners. acceptable only when the researcher’s irb grants a special waiver.