Social Studies, 05.07.2019 05:10, drandbone92
The results from research have been known to produce harms to members of the sampled population who do not actually participate in the research study. give an example of the type of research that could result in group harms by stigmatizing members of the group (even for individuals who do not participate in the research).
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 20:00, angelinaissoocp33868
Ethnicity is used to distinguish between groups based on cultural elements, but according to the information presented in the lecture (blank) would encompass the details about a person like the shape of his or her features.
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:40, mercedesamatap21hx0
The defendant is charged with the battery of a bouncer at a local tavern. at the trial, the prosecutor introduces evidence that while the bouncer was attempting to question the defendant about her intoxicated demeanor, the defendant committed a battery on the bouncer. the defendant attempts to defend against the charge on the basis of self-defense, insisting that the bouncer used excessive force in stopping her from entering the tavern. the defendant attempts to introduce into evidence an authenticated copy of the tavern records that show that three patrons had written complaints against the bouncer within the past six months for the use of excessive force. the prosecutor objects on the grounds that the records are inadmissible character evidence. should the court sustain the objection?
Answers: 3
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00, tcjet
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred. at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act. b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act. c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan. d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
The results from research have been known to produce harms to members of the sampled population who...
Mathematics, 28.10.2019 16:31
History, 28.10.2019 16:31
Social Studies, 28.10.2019 16:31
Geography, 28.10.2019 16:31