Which person best illustrates opportunities for upward social mobility in the united states?
first-shift factory worker
first-generation college student
firstborn son who inherits the family business
first-time interviewee who is hired for a job

First-generation college student

Explanation:

Upward social mobility is the process of moving from a low social position to a better one across a social hierarchy. During this transmission, each position is usually more respected and more valuable.

Family background plays a major role as a factor determining upward social mobility. Coming from a family that is educated and well off provides a far better start for a child than coming from a poor one.

First-generation college student means that the person crossed the barriers of expectation for them and moved upwards socially. Being raised in a family where nobody went to college before, he or she had to work very hard to achieve this position and may not have gotten all the support needed.

The person best to illustrate opportunities for upward social mobility in the United States is:

First-generation college student.

Explanation:

Upward Social mobility is the change of status from a social position to another. A movement of ordinary person to a high position in the society could be termed upward social mobility. People don’t just get famous or successful in life or chosen career, most of them work hard to achieve a better status. The circumstances whereby an ordinary person becomes a president of a country or a prime minister is best described as a change of status because a fundamental change has taken place; therefore upward social mobility is established.  

Further explanation

The extent to which a person could achieve an upward social mobility varies from society to society.  Upward social mobility can be extremely hard to attain in a society where caste system is practiced. In a society where caste system is being practiced, upward social mobility is determined by assignment not attainment. Caste system is very common in a country like India, where people marry within their family caste. In India, some people are born into the lower caste and it’s impossible for them to achieve upward mobility status because those people can not in any way become a higher caste. This practice is also in South Africa.  

However, upward social mobility is attainable in an open society with a class system. In the United States, an individual can become anything based on acquired education or other possible means.  

FACTORS THAT DETERMINE UPWARD SOCIAL MOBILITY INCLUDES:

In summary, upward social mobility is a situation whereby someone move from rag to riches, or a circumstances that occur when an ordinary person becomes a well known or respected political figure in a society.

LEARN MORE:

What is upward social mobility? Is it like “rags to riches”?

What seems to be the key factor (although not the rule) to upward social mobility in the us?  

The best way of characterizing what sociologists currently believe about upward social mobility for any individual is that it is the result of  

KEYWORDS:

aliens are not real, the myth was created about 700 years ago because people found markings in the field of their crops. also, no there were no aliens on the moon.

hope this ! give brainliest!

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals