Until now, only injectable vaccines against influenza have been available. parents are reluctant to subject children to the pain of injections, but adults, who are at risk of serious complications from influenza, are commonly vaccinated. a new influenza vaccine, administered painlessly in a nasal spray, is effective for children. however, since children seldom develop serious complications from influenza, no significant public health benefit would result from widespread vaccination of children using the nasal spray. which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? (a) any person who has received the injectable vaccine can safely receive the nasal spray vaccine as well.(b) the new vaccine uses the same mechanism to ward off influenza as injectable vaccines do.(c) the injectable vaccine is affordable for all adults.(d) adults do not contract influenza primarily from children who have influenza.(e) the nasal spray vaccine is not effective when administered to adults.

Describe the difference between native american beliefs about land "ownership" and european beliefs. savestylesformat instructions

The industrial revolution began in great britain for a number of reasons. two advantages great britain had which were necessary for industrialization were a. raw materials and a large workforce. b. unstable politics and a small landmass. c. abundant land and a small population. d. private wealth and a strong military.

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.