How were the reigns of james i and charles i different from those of the tudors before them? a. james i and charles i clashed with parliament. b. james i and charles i eliminated heavy taxes. c. james i and charles i supported the protestants. d. james i and charles i did not believe in the divine right of kings.

The correct answer is A. James I and Charles I clashed with Parliament.

Explanation:

Option D is wrong because James I and Charles I did actually believe in the divine right of kings and that only God could criticize their actions or direct their reign.

Although the Tudors believed in divine right, the masked this belief as they thought that good relationship with the Parliament were a valuable thing. For example, they would seek approval of the Parliament to levy new taxes.

On the other hand, James I and Charles I had a tormentuous relationship with the Parliament. JamesI said that the very existence of Parliament was a sign of sedition in subjects who could dispute what a king may do with his divine power. Charles I went even further dissolving Parliament in 1629 and ruling without it for eleven years.

A. James I and Charles I clashed with Parliament.

Explanation:

the first two-party system consisted of the federalist party, who supported the ratification of the constitution, and the democratic-republican party or the anti-administration party (anti-federalists), who opposed the powerful central government, among others, that the constitution established when it took effect in

it brings together the military and civilian sectors of society to harness the total power of the nation. it is the mechanism that facilitates the successful prosecution of any conflict.it brings together the military and civilian sectors of society to harness the total power of the nation. it is the mechanism that facilitates the successful prosecution of any conflict.