Flint v. nevada: a business owner believes state taxation laws are unconstitutional. explain which level of courts has original jurisdiction in this case—state court or federal court. explain your answer in 2 to 3 complete sentences.

The state court.

Explanation:

A business owner who believes that state taxation laws are unconstitutional should have his case handled at the state court.

This is because the state is in charge of collection and jurisdiction of sales charges.

Since in this case we are dealing with a business man then the state court has the jurisdiction to handle the case.

if you have to make a general question and respond to your thoughts, then this isn't really a question someone can you on. read the passage, form your question, and answer using your thoughts. no one else can understand how you interpreted this text if you don't tell us.

i truly dont know the answer wait i do its 1,3,4