Which factor does the supreme court generally consider especially important when deciding which cases to review?
a. whether the cases involve any federal governments employees
b. weather judicial activism appears to have influenced the case's original ruling
c. weather the lower-court ruling in the case conflicts with an earlier supreme court ruling
d. whether the cases originated in the states or federal court system

The correct answer is C) whether the lower court ruling in the case conflicts with an earlier supreme court ruling.

The factor that the Supreme Court generally consider especially important when deciding which cases to review is whether the lower court ruling in the case conflicts with an earlier supreme court ruling.

If four of the nine justices of the Supreme Court agree to grant a petition, the Supreme Court would accept to review a case. It is not an easy or common situation in that the average cases that the Supreme Court accepts to review per year are 100 cases average of approximately 5000 cases sent. So yes, the factor that the Supreme Court generally consider especially important when deciding which cases to review is whether the lower court ruling in the case conflicts with an earlier supreme court ruling.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

my man just wants some puu

explanation: