Which of the following was proposed by both the virginia and new jersey plans?

the powers of government would be divided among three branches.

the states would have more power over the federal government.

congress would be made up of the house of representatives and the senate.

congress would have the power to regulate commerce and levy taxes.

Congress would be made up of the House of representative and the Senate is the correct answer.

Explanation:

When the constituent assembly met in Philadelphia for addressing the failures of the Articles of Confederation and to decide the structure for the legislature. Two plans were proposed by the delegates; Virginia plan and New Jersey plan.

The establishment of the bicameral legislature was proposed by the Virginia plan. It was drafted by James Madison in 1787 and recommended the representation of states according to their population. It also proposed to create three branches of government. Two cameral legislature was also proposed.

The new jersey plan proposed ways to govern the US. It called for giving each state one vote in the congress irrespective of their population. William Peterson, a New Jersey delegate introduced it in the constitutional convention on June 15, 1787. It supported the unicameral legislature.

The framers mixed both the plans and it was known as the Connecticut Compromise. In the compromise, a two-house legislature was adopted with the upper house being called Senate, in which each state would have two representatives and a lower house called the house of representatives which would have representation based on the population of the state.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

fir trees are found in areas with cooler climates. fir trees have needles for leaves and remain green year-round.