How did the supreme court rule in the miranda decision?
ernesto miranda was found guilty on all counts.
ernesto miranda had been denied his rights.
ernesto miranda could not be tried twice for the same crime.
ernesto miranda did not have the right to avoid self-incrimination.

the answer is B.Ernesto Miranda had been denied his rights.

Ernesto Miranda had been denied his rights.

Explanation:

Miranda v. Arizona was an important supreme court case. In the case the supreme court ruled that the court cannot accept the defendant's authorities unless the defendant is informed of their right to have attorney during questioning and told that anything they say will be held against him.  

Miranda was arrested for kidnapping a women. The law enforcement official interrogated him, he admitted to the crimes and signed a written confession. when his case went to trial his confession was used against him.

i am pretty sure it is d.

sir frederic attributed inaccuracies to schemas. memory reconstruction is one part actual events and one part personal schema, which can result in inaccuracies when memories are reconstructed.