What term is used to describe a group that is strongly motivated by ideology, but is usually not considered to be well-defined and well-organized?

The best answer to the question: What term is used to describe a group that is strongly motivated by ideology, but is usually not considered to be well-defined and well-organized, would be: Hactivists.

Explanation:

In the world of internet, and cyberspace, today there are terms that are used to identify groups of people who work through this cyperspace and who sometimes may not do what is best. While some are outright criminals who seek to cause as much harm and panic as possible through computers, and the internet, there are others who also may do things that are not completely acceptable, but that are explainable due to their motivation through their ideologies. While the first group, which once just known as simply hackers, are termed today as cyberterrorists, the second one are known as hactivists. Hactivists is a group of cyber users who are strongly motivated by ideology, but they are usually not considered well-organized or well-defined.

as university of miami psychologists debra lieberman and adam smith pointed out in a recent article in the journal current directions in psychological science, humans have social and psychological mechanisms to deter incest. with very few exceptions, marriages between brothers and sisters and between parents and their children are verboten in every human culture. the primary psychological anti-incest mechanism is the yuck response. even the idea of sex with their mom or dad, bro or sis is upsetting to most people. the psychologist jonathan haidt has found that nearly everyone is repelled by the prospect of brother-sister sex, even in hypothetical situations in which there is no chance of pregnancy).

the biological cost of incest

this raises an interesting question: just what’s so bad about incest? sure, having sex with your dad or your sister seems gross — but why? some anthropologists have argued that incest taboos are learned social conventions. this explanation, however, doesn’t make sense to me as it does not explain the widespread existence of anti-incest mechanisms in creatures ranging from cockroaches to chimpanzees. second, the incest taboo is about as close to a universal law as human moral rules get.

why should mechanisms to avoid incest be so widespread both in nature and across human societies? the answer is simple. the problem with having sex close with relatives is that there is an astonishingly high chance that your offspring will be born with a serious birth defect.

can you explain a little further maybe give multiple choice? ?