Read the excerpt below justice holmes is explaining the ruling in the majority opinion for schenck versus united states. what point is holmes making about free speech and personal rights?

In the case Schenck v. United States, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote: "The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic."

Explanation:

depends on what they need

well since twins have about the same dna they dont have one think in common which is the figer print. nobodys fingerprint is the same. if your using twin you would most likely get around the same results for both of them because of the genetics.. i hope this