When would a plaintiff use the doctrine of res ipsa loquitor?
a. to allow the judge and jury...
Social Studies, 03.02.2020 18:48, ashtonbillups
When would a plaintiff use the doctrine of res ipsa loquitor?
a. to allow the judge and jury to infer that more likely than not, the defendant's negligence was the cause of the plaintiff's harm, even though there is no direct evidence of the defendant's lack of due care
b. to allow the judge and jury to infer that more likely than not, the defendant's negligence was not the cause of the plaintiff's harm
c. to allow the judge and jury to presume the defendant is guilty of contributory negligence
d. to allow the judge and jury to presume the defendant destroyed evidence
e. none of these
Answers: 3
Other questions on the subject: Social Studies
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30, candigirl8847
Passport video produced a video documentary titled the definitive elvis, comprising sixteen one-hour episodes. the producers interviewed more than 200 people regarding virtually all aspects of elvis's life. passport sold the videos commercially for a profit. approximately 5 to 10 percent of the videos were composed of copyrighted music and appearances of presley on television and in movies owned by copyright holders other than passport. passport did not obtain permission to use those copyrighted works. elvis presley enterprises, inc., and other companies and individuals that owned copyrights to the presley works used by passport sued passport for copyright infringement. passport defended, arguing that its use of the copyrighted materials was fair use. the u. s. district court held in favor of the plaintiff copyright holders and enjoined passport from further distribution of its documentary videos. passport appealed. did passport act ethically in including the elvis presley copyrighted material in its video? why do you think passport video did so? has there been fair use in this case, or has there been copyright infringement?
Answers: 2
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:10, moonk7733
Cole's smart phone is two years old and he would like to have a new one. this time, he wants to make sure that it has a longer battery charge and better geographic coverage since he is traveling three days a week for his new job. cole is most likely to use for this purchase
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:50, seannasal2804
Astudy that involves interviews of adults is eligible for expedited review. the researcher wants to add an adolescent population (aged 12 to 17) to the study and has designed a parental permission and assent process. no additional changes are planned. which of the following statements about review of the revised protocol is accurate? the research would only be eligible for expedited review if the adolescents are capable of understanding the same consent forms used for the adult population. the research would only be eligible for expedited review if the adolescents have been declared to be emancipated minors. the new research would need full review by a convened irb because children are a protected population. unless the nature of the questions would raise the level of risk to > minimal for adolescents, the research would still qualify for expedited review.
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Questions in other subjects:
History, 29.03.2021 18:50
Mathematics, 29.03.2021 18:50
