The decision in king v. chapman, (1945) was key in ending which of these in georgia? a) racism b) discrimination c) the "jim crow" era d) the "white primary"

D) The "White Primary"

The case consisted of the lawsuit made by Primus E. King, an African American who was denied his right to vote in the Democratic Party’s primary election of Columbus, Georgia. According to Georgia statutes, the primaries were only for Whites.

In 1945, United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia ruled in favor of King, by determining that the exclusion of black voters was unconstitutional under the Fourteenth, Fifteenth and Seventeenth Amendments. The decision ended the "White Primary" in Georgia, and eventually, other "White Primaries" of Southern states were struck down too.

D) the "White Primary"

The court case between Primus E. King, a religious leader and a barber in Columbus, Georgia, and J. E. Chapman Jr. the chair of the Muscogee County Democratic Party started in 1946.

Primus E. King, an African-American registered voter, had gone to the Muscogee County Courthouse in Columbus to cast his vote on July 4, 1944,  in the then-Democratic Party’s primary election, however, he was asked to leave by law enforcement.

Fortunately for Primus E. King, a local physician who co-founded the local branch of the NAACP, encouraged and financially backed Mr. King in his lawsuit filed in federal court, styled "King v. Chapman." Mr. Primus E. King was favored by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, the court concluded that the exclusion of black voters was unconstitutional under the Fourteenth, Fifteenth and Seventeenth Amendments, and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal by J. E. Chapman Jr, which ended the State of Georgia's "whites only" primaries.

unknown. best bet to watch it is at kissanime (a lot of popups and has ads and has potential to be a virus not recommended) or crunchyroll (recommended but has ads and has no popups). you will have to wait. i really want netflix to give the other seasons.

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals