Social Studies
Social Studies, 24.06.2019 16:00, kbenitez90

The supreme court case new york times company v. united states was a landmark case with far-reaching implications for the first amendment and prior restraint. prior restraint is a key concept to understand for journalists and anyone else who creates messages for the public because it represents the degree of power the government has to stop the dissemination of news and other content. after reading the case, write a journal summarizing the case in your own words and provide substantiation with references. the goal of putting it in your own words is to demonstrate that you understand the concepts covered in the case. while you may use a citation to support, do not rely only on others' descriptions. discuss how this landmark legal decision impacted the press and free speech. how can this case guide actions for professional communicators as they create messages in a digital setting

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:20, VBTSPILOTS2945
Which statement best describes an advantage of indirect democracy over direct democracy? a. it can make decision making more efficient b. it can citizens feel more connected to government c. it can be more responsive to citizens' interests d. it can better reflect the democratic principle of majority rule
Answers: 3
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 19:30, myrkaxsanchezz
When we adapt our current understandings to incorporate information we have engaged in?
Answers: 3
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 19:50, missy922527
In e. c. tolman's experiment, some rats were trained to run through mazes for standard food goals, while other rats were allowed to explore the mazes for 10 days without food goals or other rewards. later, when food rewards were placed in a box at the far end of the maze, the previously unrewarded rats reached the food box as quickly as the rewarded rats after only one or two trials. this experiment demonstrated that the rats had the ability to form of their surroundings.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:00, toxsicity
Karin bought illegal firearms at a gun show. at her trial, she alleged that she had committed this crime because her boyfriend had threatened to harm her and her two daughters if she did not. her lawyer asked the judge to instruct the jury that the prosecution had an obligation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that karin had acted freely. instead, the judge told the jury that karin had the burden of proving duress by a preponderance of the evidence. who is correct?
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
The supreme court case new york times company v. united states was a landmark case with far-reaching...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
History, 11.07.2019 23:00
Konu
Mathematics, 11.07.2019 23:00