Which two statements might explain why the communist government altered the photograph before publishing it? the sign advertising watches for sale shows support for capitalism, not communism. the communists inserted signs and banners that implied strong public support for their goal of overthrowing the tsar. the communists wanted to recognize individuals who supported the revolution, so they made their faces easier to see. the answers are the top two.

A and B are correct

The correct statement are: "The sign advertising watches for sale shows support for capitalism, not communism. -  The communists inserted signs and banners that implied strong public support for their goal of overthrowing the tsar."

Communist propaganda in the Soviet Union relied extensively on the Marxist-Leninist ideology to promote the line of the Communist Party. In societies with widespread censorship, propaganda was omnipresent and vigorously reinforced. Penetrated even in the social and natural sciences giving rise to various pseudoscientific theories such as Lysenkoism, while the fields of real knowledge, such as genetics, cybernetics and comparative linguistics, were condemned and banned as "bourgeois pseudoscience". With "the repressed truths, the falsehoods in each field were incessantly rubbed in the printing, in interminable meetings, in the school, in mass demonstrations, on the radio".

answer; ///(c) i believe that the correct answer is ethnic relations bear many similarities across different global; good luck

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.