In 3 to 4 sentences mention one disadvantage of using real gdp per capita as a standard of living measurement

Even the gross domestic product is a very good economy production measure, it is not a very good standard of living measurement because if we compare two countries and one has higher GDP than another, it may seem that it has a greater welfare; however, this is not at all like because we are not considering the population of each country and their individual incomes and how are distributed the ones.

Consumers may buy cheap,low quality,short lived products repeatedly instead of buying more expensive,longer lasting goods.Over time,consumers could spend more replacing cheap goods than they would have if they had bought higher quality goods in the first place,and GDP would grow as a result of waste and inefficiency.eg.China exporting cheap and worst quality goods all over the world and other countries are showing fake GDP numbers and not saying a word against China.

answer; /// the answer to the first question is (b) it began when people first deliberately seeds; /// and (d); // it gave people a steady food supple for the first time;

answer:

d. because dr. laguardia selected a widely used measure, his study generalizes to has strong external validity. external validity has limited external validity. other applications of this measure.

the widely used measure that he applied to his experiment was the benton facial recognition test. it employed on to football players and as result, only players who suffered brain concussions did not pas this test. and although it has an external validity, it is limited because it isn't general to apply to other population.