In the case below, the original source material is given along with a sample of student work. determine the type of plagiarism by clicking the appropriate radio button. original source material student version if learners are new to critique, we see anonymity as a scaffold to generating critical feedback. learners can practice giving feedback knowing they are not vulnerable to social repercussions. less than perfect expressions, unwarranted negative reactions, and fruitless ideas are bound to be part of novice feedback, but teachers hope to create learning configurations that support both the giver and the receiver of feedback, especially if the commenters are novices. references: howard, c.d., barrett, a. f., & frick, t. w. (2010). anonymity to promote peer feedback: pre-service teachers' comments in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. journal of educational computing research, 43(1), 89-112.

The true option is "This is not plagiarism"

Explanation:

The question is not complete since it does not provide the complete information, here is the complete question:

If learners are new to critique, we see anonymity as a scaffold to generating critical feedback. Learners can practice giving feedback knowing they are not vulnerable to social repercussions. Less than perfect expressions, unwarranted negative reactions, and fruitless ideas are bound to be part of novice feedback, but teachers hope to create learning configurations that support both the giver and the receiver of feedback, especially if the commenters are novices. References: Howard, C. D., Barrett, A. F., & Frick, T. W. (2010).

Anonymity to promote peer feedback: Pre-service teachers' comments in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(1), 89-112. If providing peer feedback is a skill to be learned then perhaps it is advisable to give learners opportunities to practice giving feedback knowing they are not vulnerable to social repercussions. In this way, anonymity can act "as a scaffold to generating critical feedback" (Howard, Barrett, & Frick, 2010, p. 104). References: Howard, C. D., Barrett, A. F., & Frick, T. W. (2010). Anonymity to promote peer feedback: Pre-service teachers' comments in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(1), 89-112.

Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?

Word-for-Word plagiarism

Paraphrasing plagiarism

This is not plagiarism

The student's version takes the original version as a reference but it does not copy the paragraph and present it as an original idea, that's the reason why this can not be considered plagiarism, besides the second version respects the information of the first by paraphrasing it so it conveys the same message but with different words.

what organizations did you select

the main idea of monster inc is good and evil

if im wrong correct me but have a blessed day!