In the case of vokes v. arthur murray, inc. a woman took thousands of dollars worth of dancing lessons. when she sued the company that gave the lessons the court held: a. she made a unilateral mistake of quality. b. she made a unilateral mistake of value. c. she was defrauded and could recover her money. d. she was not defrauded and could not recover.

The correct answer is option C

When she sued the company that gave the lessons the court held: she was defrauded and could recover her money.

C is the, kind of, correct answer.

In Vokes v. Arthur Murray, a woman took thousands of dollars worth of dancing lessons because the company kept puffing up how well she was doing (she was terrible) to get her to take more on the grounds that she was improving (she wasn't).

Since the dance class had superior knowledge, they were viewed by the appellate court as having defrauded Vokes and the case was remanded back for trial.

abolish

do away with

unanimous

in complete agreement

secede

separate; break free

inauguration

starting a new position with a formal ceremony.

cooperationist

people who wanted the north to cooperate with the south

surrender

to give up

volunteer

perform a service for free

draft

involuntary service in military

retreat

withdraw; move away from enemy

advisor

expert who gives advice

explanation:

the technology changed agriculture in an impacting manner since many people left the field work by a cellular or other technological appliances