According to the result of the texas vs. johnson case, could a state have a law that makes it illegal to burn money as a form of political protest? a. yes, because symbolic speech can be limited by the government. b. no, because symbolic speech cannot be limited by the government selected: c. yes, because money is protected by the fourth amendmentthis answer is incorrect. d. no, because burning things is always legal as long as it is your property.

C.) No because symbolic speech cannot be limited by the government.

Hope this helped :)

it is a part of john locke's natural rights popular during the age of enlightenment that people had inalienable rights to life, liberty and property. this was reflected by thomas jefferson in his declaration of independence as rights to life,liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

another line in the declaration of independence is that people have certain rights just because they are human. humans are capable of obeying the three natural rights john locke mentioned making them governable by these laws and therefore entitled to these rights as well.

dude you should crop your image so only the question shows. but   can you explain it better