In this lesson, you played the role of a juror in the case of snoozer v. early. what type of case was it, and what could be its outcome? a.) it was a criminal case. felina early faced possible jail time for failing to control her cat. b.) it was a civil case. snoozer was seeking compensation for the loss of her birds. c.) it was a civil case. early was seeking compensation for the loss of her cat. d.) it was a criminal case. snoozer faced possible jail time for lying about her neighbor.

Your answer is B

hope this helps

it was B

Explanation:

I took the test and i got the answer right hope this helps you everyone

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals

these are the choices

local priests

european monarchs

common people

bible translators