Why do historians consider political cartoons to be credible resources in historical inquiry? most people read them, so they have to be credible. they are drawn by people who are directly involved in the events they are depicting. they are drawn by people who have an opinion about the event. historians do not consider political cartoons to be credible historical evidence.

They are considered to be credible because they are the opinions of the American public at the time compared to historians writing them now. Usually these cartoons represented the public's opinion and were seen as true.

answer: hey improve the marine life in a certain area.

they provide a new location for fishermen to fish and which works to ease the pressure on natural reefs.

they are a great way to get rid of large objects that would otherwise be placed on landfills

explanation:

american political culture includes a plenty of focus views and preferences. not all westerns experience the same opinions, of course, but the large preponderance promises to these general ideas, including equality, justice, freedom, individualism, integrity, and difference.

the united states is a democratic republic. residents elect representatives to governmental, nation, and local administration; those deputies create the regulations that command u.s. community. although emptiness in u.s. law needs it, in usage, the administrative system is ruled by executive factions.