There are three branches of government in the united states. the executive, legislative and judicial branch. each branch of government has their own roles in each level, the federal, state, and local level. this is called separation of powers. the executive branch at the federal level would be considered the president. the president directs the executive branch. the president also has the power to sign or veto a law, as well as declare war. at the state level, the executive branch is the governor. the governors major duty would be the signing or vetoing or laws passed by the legislature. at the local level, the executive branch would be the mayor. the mayor regulates local department such as police, fire, education, and transportation. the legislative branch has duties to fulfill at every level, federal, state, and local, similar to the executive branch. at the federal level, the u. s. congress would be the legislative branch. the u. s congress is the lawmaking aspect of the government and has two parts. the senate, and the house of representatives. at the state level, the state legislature is a representative from the state who approves state budgets and initiate tax legislation. locally, the city council would be in charge of major project and infrastructure of the city in order to continue improving community growth and finances. finally, the judicial branch is in charge of interpreting laws in comparison to the constitution. federally, this would be the u. s supreme court, the largest and most powerful court in the u. s. at the state level, this would be considered appeal courts. and at the local level, the circuit courts, district courts, as well as probate courts are in charge of analyzing laws to determine right from wrong. separation of powers has a substantial effect on how the way a government works. without it, the u. s government would have no way of controlling power, as one branch would become the ultimate superior.

Yes the 3 branches are judicial, legislative, and executive. (Is that the question)

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

just don't strip down in public lol