Scottish researchers compared rates of depression between 94 undergraduates who regularly kept diaries and 41 students who did not. they found that people who kept diaries were more likely to have depression than those who did not. the researchers said, "we expected diary-keepers to have some benefit, or be the same, but they were the worst off. you are probably much better off if you don't write anything at all."

Another explanation could be that people who are depressed are more likely to keep a diary. This is an observational study, so it is not possible to associate that writing in a diary as a cause, leads to depression as the effect.Their interpretation of the results was flawed because the researchers assumed an order of cause and effect and looked at the results only from one direction. Another example would be if we assume that obesity is related to depression. We can look at it two ways: that depression can lead to obeisty through over eating or the other way around, that overweight people are more likely to become depressed.

well since twins have about the same dna they dont have one think in common which is the figer print. nobodys fingerprint is the same. if your using twin you would most likely get around the same results for both of them because of the genetics.. i hope this

sir frederic attributed inaccuracies to schemas. memory reconstruction is one part actual events and one part personal schema, which can result in inaccuracies when memories are reconstructed.