In the lesson, you played the role of a juror in the case of state v. justin b. goode. in that case, when the defense attorney cross-examined suss pihshawn, his goal was to question the police officer and challenge the evidence against mr. goode question the police officer and challenge the evidence against the state meet with suss pihshawn to discuss strategy without the jury around meet with suss pihshawn to discuss what verdict he will recommend

The answer is:  B. question the police officer and challenge the evidence against the state

The main duty of defendants in a trial is to defend the accused from potential charges that brought by his/her oppositions. Challenging the evidence from the police/state usually being done to make that evidences become obsolete. If the defendants able to do this, the juries would see the defendant more favorably.

they can increase to boost the enonomy.

panem is a communist totalitarian dictatorship where all the resources and how they are allocated belongs to the capitol. the districts exist only to provide goods and services for the capital and most of the citizens live in poverty. it is a police state where the "peacekeepers" use force and threats to keep the people under control. dissent is outlawed and those who disobey the law are executed, flogged, or turned into avoxes. the games are another means in which the ruling elite in the capitol exert their power over the districts. when reading the books i drew parallels between panem and the soviet union and north korea. in no way is panem capitalist. the people in the capitol are wealthy but the majority of them are involved in the government somehow. it was the same way in the former soviet union where bigwigs in the communist party and high ranking government officials were given access to goods, services, medical treatments not available to the general public. if you think panem has a capitalist economy you need to brush up on your economics.