What do the manufacturing production process development, logistics and inventory control, and health, safety, and environmental assurance pathways have in common? they all involve producing retail products. they all involve evaluating and creating processes. they all involve producing automotive products. they all involve evaluating and creating safety procedures.

ima go with c auto motive

Manufacturing Production, Process Development, Logistics and Inventory Control, and health, Safety, and Environmental Assurance parthways have in common that they all involve evaluationg and creating safety procedures.

Explanation:Evaluating and Creating processes is a labor that requires an established methodology. Which has to consider all the different processes of the manufacturing system and process.

First of all a) is wrong because even though it could be applied to retail production it is not specific to them. This methodology applies to all kinds of products.

Second, B) is wrong because even though all processes could be developed following the mentioned elements. Only safety procedures will include health, safety, and environmental assurance pathways. Many times, these factors weren't considered and manufacturing procedures presented flaws and bad effects on employees, that's why the industry developed the so-called safety procedures.

Then, c) also is wrong for the same reason. All types of production have to consider the same elements according to the government established regulations to allow business manufacture.

D) is right because the safety procedures are the processes that can guide the worker from the start to the finish of the execution of a manufacturing process considering his health, safety and the environmental footprint the process has in the world. Governments allied with industries defined them and they are now sought universally.

debating and finalizing the detail of the policy

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.