According to howard, barrett, and frick (2010), in order to make appropriate choices educators must understand the ways in which hiding or showing the identity of participants can impact the interaction that takes place in peer feedback activities. obscuring the identity of participants in peer feedback "may create a social context where learners feel freer to express varied ideas, and make the task of giving feedback less inhibited" (p. 90).

In a difficult job such as designing a website for education, professors may require the further creation of multiple resolutions in students' companion feedback. Anonymity may generate a social connection where students feel easier to express different opinions and execute the task of providing feedback less frustrated. However, educators demand how anonymity influences the training productive in order to obtain informed decisions about during anonymous arrangements are suitable in equal feedback.

уєѕ нє ℓσѕт ¢σитяσℓ σf нιѕ ρυριℓѕ

well, i can't read it so i'll ask you questions about it : )

if you were a reader and you read the introduction, would you want to read more?

does it start with a question? if so, is it something you would want to read about?

and ask any friends or family for their opinion : )