Social Studies
Social Studies, 08.07.2019 22:00, princeofpowerjr

What arguments did people who opposed using the atomic bomb on japan make to support their point of view? check all of the boxes that apply. japan was ready to surrender. invading japan would cost thousands of american lives the atomic bomb was a terrible weapon that would bring great death and destruction to japan. the united states had only two atomic bombs left. the firebombing of japan’s cities had already done more damage than the atomic bomb would the united states could make japan fear the atomic bomb’s power without killing anyone.

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 15:30, Powerhickory1313
How do you think that attitude affected the outcome of the novel? did the attitude contribute to the fate of the characters ?
Answers: 3
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:30, kellinvagneur
What were the nuremberg laws? who did they target and how? list 3 ways people were targeted by the nazis.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:00, ahoney2233
Latonya was just hired as an engineer for an electric company. she will make a salary of $50,000 a year. how much of latonya's salary will be taxed at the 10 percent rate? how much of latonya's salary will be taxed at the 28 percent rate? latonya was just hired as an engineer for an electric company. she will make a salary of $50,000 a year. how much of latonya's salary will be taxed at the 10 percent rate? how much of latonya's salary will be taxed at the 28 percent rate?
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:20, pamdhuber4224
According to the world bank, e. u. remittances to senegal were $1,005,728,139$1,005,728,139 in 2015. senegal's gross domestic product (gdp) was $13,779,570,750$13,779,570,750 in 2015. what percentage of senegal's 2015 gdp is represented by the remittances? round your answer to one place after the decimal. remittances as percent of gdp: %% based on the washington post article, e. u. launches $2 billion plan to keep africans from migrating, which explanation correctly explains why senegal's government would or would not implement policies to restrict illegal migration from senegal to the european union? because remittances represent such a large percentage of senegal's gdp, senegal's government faces an incentive to do nothing to stop illegal migration to the european union. because remittances are sent from senegalese workers in senegal to their family members in the european union, senegal's government faces no incentive to crack down on illegal migration. because remittances represent such a small percentage of national income, senegal's government does not find it worth its time to implement policies to prevent illegal migration. because remittances are sent from senegalese workers in senegal to their family members in the european union, senegal's government faces a large incentive to crack down on illegal migration.
Answers: 3
Do you know the correct answer?
What arguments did people who opposed using the atomic bomb on japan make to support their point of...

Questions in other subjects: