Which statement describes a benefit of international trade? chawalia is a south asian nation with an agricultural economy specializing in production of aromatic rice. /to increase production, the government introduces mechanized farming./ this process increases the production of rice by 120%. the government begins exporting the surplus rice to europe and the americas. /from then on, aromatic rice exports makes up 40% of chawalia’s annual gdp./ to further increase production, chawalia formulates a program aimed at producing a minimum of 50 million tons of rice every year. it brings more land under cultivation. /it conducts workshops and training sessions on good agricultural practices./ it provides financing to farmers for buying farm equipment. as a result, more and more farmers practice mechanized farming, leading to a further increase in production. /soon, chawalia has a 33% share of global rice production./

Answer and Explanation

Countries gain from exchange when trade enables each country to receive a higher price for exported goods and/or pay a lower price for imported goods. This leads to more efficient resource allocation and allows consumption of a larger variety of goods.International trade is where there is exchange of goods and services across International territories where in most countries this exchange represents a significant a share of gross domestic product(GDP). One of the most immediate benefits of this trade is lower costs to consumers

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

there are indirect ways of affecting state laws   by with holding funding's. and that's why we have a 55mph speed on the high way with a design of 70mph speed.