The fallacy of drawing a conclusion about an entire group of people or things based on an undersized sample of the group is known as:

The answer is "Hasty generalization".

Hasty generalization is a kind of logical fallacy. A fallacy is a contention that depends on mixed up thinking. When one makes a hurried speculation, he applies a conviction to a bigger populace than he should in view of the data that he has.  

For instance, if my sibling likes to eat a great deal of pizza and French fries, and he is sound, I can state that pizza and French fries are solid and don't generally make a man fat. Be that as it may, I don't have a sufficiently extensive example populace to make this case. I have summed up in light of one individual.

if you have ask any question and if you have got the answer reply for your position there will be option for making a brain least answer you need to click click there and they can get the points in brain list main thing is that you need to choose those answer which answer you are you think that it is to you

giant impact theory - the moon was formed from the collision between earth and another mars-sized body.

colliding planetesimals hypothesis - the moon was formed from the same cloud of material as earth.

capture hypothesis - the moon was locked into orbit by earths gravity as it was passing by it.

accretion hypothesis - the moon was formed from collisions and combining of planetesimals.

i think this is right, if not and you know better let me know.