Social Studies
Social Studies, 10.07.2019 12:30, dieguezisabel

Regarding research studies, validity is to reliability as is to a. cohort effects; correctness b. generalizability; cohort effects c. repeatability; generalizability d. accuracy; consistency

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 22:50, roseemariehunter12
A. spinoza thinks that we human beings are due for what was described in class as an “ontological demotion.” explain this ontological demotion, comparing his view of what we are to a more traditional aristotelian view. (you should concentrate on spinoza’s views on the human body, but be sure to say something about what he thinks the human mind is.) why does he think the demotion is needed? is he right? explain why the demotion matters to the overall project of the ethics.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30, ChocCole
Where did thomas pain right the federalist papers
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:00, rorea710
These facilities were organized and sponsored by churches or charities during the great depression in an effort to feed the homeless and needy.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, nanagardiner08
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Regarding research studies, validity is to reliability as is to a. cohort effects; correctness b....

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 11.03.2021 18:40
Konu
Social Studies, 11.03.2021 18:40