What is the term for people with a disproportionate share of power?

Will give brainliest to the correct answer no randoms the pope cannot forgive any guilt, except by declaring that it has been forgiven by godand by giving in to god's forgiveness. therefore those preachers of in dulgences are in error, who say that by the pope'sindulgences a man is freed from every penalty, and saved. christians are to be taught that he who gives to the poor or lends to the needy does abetter work than buying indulgences. the excerpt above is from martin luther's ninety-five theses. luther posting the ninety-fivetheses is traditionally considered the beginning of the

In the compound republic of america, the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments, and then the portion allotted to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments. hence a double security arises to the rights of the people. the different governments will control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.—madison, number 51 based on the quote, which of the following statements would madison have likely supported? development of political parties is necessary to ensure the security and stability of a democratic government. a government must have enough power to govern however, its power must also be limited by creating multiple branches within it. one government can not carry out the will of the people alone, therefore the establishment of two separate governments is necessary. a government must sometimes limit civil liberties of individuals to ensure the safety and security of all citizens.

Which best explains why the supreme court’s decision in plessy v. ferguson was unconstitutional? the supreme court’s ruling allowed states to deny equal protection to any person within its jurisdiction. since the 14th amendment did not make concessions for people born outside the us, the supreme court’s decision could not be applied. the supreme court’s decision gave individual states the freedom to make their own laws in relation to non-whites. since segregation laws did not provide equal protections or liberties to non-whites, the ruling was not consistent with the 14th amendment.