Evolutionary psychologists would most likely explain females' greater emphasis on potential mates' economic resources by suggesting that it: increases females' confidence about the maternity of their children increases the likelihood of survival for their children supports their innate need for a large territory allows them to acquire a greater variety of time-saving appliances

I believe the answer is: increases resources available for their children.

This could even be seen in modern day mate selection. When you observe it, you would notice that men with 'high power/influence' tend to have the largest option in term of selection. This happen because high power/influence is usually correlated with ability to obtain large amount of resource (wealth/connections)

i'm not sure what you are asking, but it also served as a debtors colony, was ran by the trustees for 20 years until becoming a royal colony, and people had restrictions such as no slaves, and only 50 acres of land per person/ hope this !

- jack watson

d - failures.

the only attempted british colony in north america before 1600 was roanoke, virginia, which was a total failure. england claimed several areas, including newfoundland, but made no sustainable attempts to colonize them before 1600.