A5-year-old girl observes a stranger in a store pretending to discipline a stuffed dog. when the stranger moves on to the next aisle, the girl picks up another stuffed animal and does the same thing. her behavior is similar to the findings in studies conducted by: albert bandura. b. f. skinner. edward thorndike. rosalie rayner.

What can you conclude about the information given here ? a)juveniles must testify in court b)adults are held to a lower standard c)the state guarantees that juveniles have legal rights much like those of adults d) punishment for juveniles violators are much more strict than those for adults

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.

Give me 5 solid reasons why death penalty should be remove?for debate!