Leslie, a sociology major, believes that waffles are the key to happiness. her friend ann, a psychology major, believes that good health is the key to happiness. how might the two friends resolve their disagreement

The answer is "They could research peer-reviewed articles to see if either perspective is supported."

By taking a gander at distributed and looked into articles, the two could examine diverse hypotheses and check whether both of their guesses are right. By doing this, Lesley and Stephen can hope to check whether there are any replicable examinations that offer belief to either perspective.

Sociology and psychology are two social sciences that are corresponding to each other. However, sociology includes the investigation of gathering conduct of people on a large scale level, while psychology is more worried about what goes inside the mind of a person in various circumstances and situations.

The two friends could resolve their agreement if they could research peer-reviewed articles to know if both of their perspectives are supported.

The two friends can resolve their argument by consulting articles to ascertain if their perspectives are supported. The two friends could as well examine different hypotheses to confirm if both guesses are confirmed to be right.

In doing so, Lesley and Stephen can look to verify if any existing or replicative studies accept or agree with their positions.

Sociology is the social science that is concerned with the study of society, human relationships, and their behaviors.

It is a social science that involves using empirical investigation and critical examination to understand social order, including problems and changes in an organization, networks and also within the society.

Sociology as a branch of social science is very wide and involves many areas, that is, it covers many areas which include education, law, poverty, social class. It also covers many theoretical matters such as the effect of radical changes in all societies.

However, psychology is also a social science. It is the study of the mind and seeks to have a clear understanding of individuals and groups using general principles.

LEARN MORE:

KEYWORDS:

answer; the above statement is (false);

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: