Social Studies, 14.07.2019 07:00, ash011519

Quick first awnser will be named the brainliest user. miranda v arizona outcome and significance gideon v wainwright outcome and significance in re gault outcome and significance

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Issues. Miranda v. Arizona was a significant Supreme Court case that ruled that a defendant's statements to authorities are inadmissible in court unless the defendant has been informed of their right to have an attorney present during questioning and an understanding that anything they say will be held against them.

Gideon v. Wainwright. Gideon v. Wainwright, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 18, 1963, ruled (9–0) that states are required to provide legal counsel to indigent defendants charged with a felony. ... At his first trial he requested a court-appointed attorney but was denied.

Gerald (“Jerry”) Gault was a 15 year-old accused of making an obscene telephone call to a neighbor, Mrs. Cook, on June 8, 1964. After Mrs. Cook filed a complaint, Gault and a friend, Ronald Lewis, were arrested and taken to the Children’s Detention Home. Gault was on probation when he was arrested, after being in the company of another boy who had stolen a wallet from a woman’s purse. Lower Courts: The proceedings against Gault were conducted by a judge of the Superior Court of Arizona who was designated by his colleagues to serve as a juvenile court judge.

Lower Court Ruling: The juvenile court judge committed Gault to juvenile detention until he attained the age of 21. At that time, no appeal was permitted in juvenile cases by Arizona law; therefore, a habeas petition was filed in the Supreme Court of Arizona and referred to the Superior Court for a hearing. The Superior Court dismissed the petition, and the Arizona Supreme Court affirmed. The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case to determine the procedural rights of a juvenile defendant in delinquency proceedings where there is a possibility of incarceration. Reversed and remanded. In its opinion, the Court unanimously overruled Betts v. Brady.

Hope this helps!!

answered: Guest

i do believe that the correct answer is (technical reasoning); luck

explanation:

answered: Guest

The frame of government of pennsylvaniawas a constitution for the province of pennsylvania a proprittarycoony granted to william penne by charles ii of england. the frame of government has lasting historical importance as an important step in the development of american and world democracy.

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 00:50, blanca04fp

Cooper's contribution to the american novel was savestylesformat instructions

Answers: 3

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:00, Satoetoe24

Marian recently made the decision to try to re-wallpaper her own kitchen—which was a mistake given her personality! to compound the mistake, she selected a complex wallpaper pattern that included flowers and trees. each time she put one strip of paper on the wall, she became increasingly upset if there was not a perfect match from the pattern of one strip to the next. if one flower was off by as much as one-tenth of an inch, she would tear down the strip, remove the excess paste, and try again with the next strip. over eight hours after she started this job, she has only succeeded at putting up six strips of wallpaper, which covered about 10 percent of the room in which she was working. marian may suffer from personality disorder.

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:40, mercedesamatap21hx0

The defendant is charged with the battery of a bouncer at a local tavern. at the trial, the prosecutor introduces evidence that while the bouncer was attempting to question the defendant about her intoxicated demeanor, the defendant committed a battery on the bouncer. the defendant attempts to defend against the charge on the basis of self-defense, insisting that the bouncer used excessive force in stopping her from entering the tavern. the defendant attempts to introduce into evidence an authenticated copy of the tavern records that show that three patrons had written complaints against the bouncer within the past six months for the use of excessive force. the prosecutor objects on the grounds that the records are inadmissible character evidence. should the court sustain the objection?

Answers: 3

continue

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:30, kittenface3428

In human relations, the irritation threshold is the

Answers: 1

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

Quick first awnser will be named the brainliest user. miranda v arizona outcome and significance g...