Compiling data into a table is not a useful method for distinguishing between contrasting observations.

There are no choices available but I am assuming that you are asking whether the statement is a fact or not. The statement above is wrong. Compiling data on tables is an efficient and productive way of comparing and contrasting observations. Scientists use this in their controlled experiments. 

The correct answer is false.

It is false that compiling data into a table is not a useful method for distinguishing between contrasting observations.

To the contrary, yes, it’s true that compiling data into a table is not a useful method for distinguishing between contrasting observations. Any table or graphic that allows you to put information into tabulates in order to classify and compare information, is a good method in the interpretation of results when you are doing research or analysing financial data. Statistics help you to understand information in a quantitative way.  

local max is .5

step-by-step explanation:

the local maximum is for x values between 2 and 4

it looks like the x value is 2.5 and the y value is .5

every society, in order to meet the needs of it's people, has to answer three basic questions:

- what should we produce?

- how should we produce it?

- for whom should we produce it?

this questions must be answered in order to, option b, aid in production decisions.

every country can't produce everything, no matter how rich their land is. it may be a matter of technology, resources or geographical conditions. so, these three questions must be resolved in order to get the most of the production of each land.

hope this !