Physics, 31.07.2019 07:30, richard80

If a star does not emit a significant amount of visible radiation, what could you conclude? a)it will not be able to be seen b)it is a black hole c)it is a very intense star d)it is not a very intense star

Answers: 1

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Physics

Physics, 21.06.2019 21:00, emilyrobles

The density of a liquid could be found by using

Answers: 2

continue

Physics, 22.06.2019 17:40, tylercapozzoli

Scientists follow specific processes in order to determine valid explanations and conclusions from observations. david observed strange lights in the sky above his home outside of roswell, new mexico. the only explanation that makes sense to him is that there are ufos in the area. what should david do next to verify his explanation?

Answers: 1

continue

Physics, 22.06.2019 18:00, pleasedontspamme

Consider an ideal gas at 27.0 degrees celsius and 1.00 atmosphere pressure. imagine the molecules to be uniformly spaced, with each molecule at the center of a small cube. what is the length l of an edge of each small cube if adjacent cubes touch but don't overlap?

Answers: 2

continue

Physics, 23.06.2019 02:30, bombo99

Anthropology is the study of the effects of disease on the body, while forensic anthropology studies the disease of crime a.) true b.) false

Answers: 2

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

If a star does not emit a significant amount of visible radiation, what could you conclude? a)it wi...