Physics
Physics, 14.12.2019 15:31, imcool666

Which best explains why elements with a completely full outer shell of electrons do not usually bond with other elements to form compounds?

a.
a full outer shell of electrons indicates a stable state, making the formation of compounds unnecessary. the full outer shell was obtained by releasing electrons instead of forming a compound.

b.
these elements have obtained electrons from other elements without bonding to create a full outer shell of electrons, and a stable state.

c.
elements with a completely full outer shell of electrons are in their most stable state. therefore, achieving stability through the formation of compounds is not necessary.

d.
because electrons orbit some atoms in three dimensional space, they move to different orbitals to stabilize the atom, making the formation of compounds unnecessary.
explain.

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Physics

image
Physics, 21.06.2019 22:00, chgraypto
What is the role of the ocular lens?
Answers: 1
image
Physics, 22.06.2019 04:00, katelynn73
Several mountains together form a mountain . a few of these combined form a mountain system. several systems combined form a mountain , which can stretch thousands of miles in length.
Answers: 2
image
Physics, 22.06.2019 05:00, heavyhearttim
Asmall 21 kilogram canoe is floating downriver at a speed of 1 m/s. what is the canoe's kinetic energy?
Answers: 1
image
Physics, 22.06.2019 15:40, byronanderson
If two parallel light rays hit a mirror, they will not be parallel to each other after they reflect.
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Which best explains why elements with a completely full outer shell of electrons do not usually bond...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 30.03.2020 16:40
Konu
English, 30.03.2020 16:41
Konu
Mathematics, 30.03.2020 16:41