Morse code and string phone cup 1.What was different about the two methods?

2.If your string phone stretched out one block long, which method do you think would be clearer?

3. If you had a Morse Code expert on both ends to act like a computer taking in information, would that make a difference?​

Following are the responses to the given question:

Explanation:

Following are the difference in the speed and accuracy:

The biggest difference was its tone between both the cup method as well as the Morse code. One should talk using cup system and sequence system and let its covering be understood in Morse code, just a series of beeps weren’t tangible... Secondly, a method of cup involves a range string. Rukun Negara is often distributed by cable, but this is a greater range. It reaches concurrently in those other areas.

In the case of using the string method for the block, its distance and stiffness of the string are limited and the barriers are eliminated. It will certainly be convenient and clearer if one utilizes Sign language.

If two experts are acting like such a machine on both sides, their information between both the 2 persons is smoother and quicker as they will not have to wait for data from a third person which may create another pause at the time.

Morse code is faster, eventually. For some very small periods when sensitive information is not transmitted, strings or cup methods must be reserved.

which three statements are true about all alloys?