Physics
Physics, 03.04.2020 02:29, gabby7398

Since rods are about 1000 times more sensitive than cones (at 470 nm), they should be able to detect smaller values of the electric field. Assuming rods and cones are sensitive to the average energy density of an electromagnetic wave, which of the following statements is the most accurate?a. Rods are about 1000 times more sensitive than cones. b. Rods are about 3 times more sensitive than cones. c. Rods and cones are about equally sensitive. d. Cones are about 3 times more sensitive than rods. e. Cones are about 1000 times more sensitive than rods.

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Physics

image
Physics, 22.06.2019 04:30, tayveon122
Light that is polarized along the vertical direction is incident on a sheet of polarizing material. only 96% of the intensity of the light passes through the sheet and strikes a second sheet of polarizing material. no light passes through the second sheet. what angle does the transmission axis of the second sheet make with the vertical?
Answers: 2
image
Physics, 22.06.2019 10:30, jdkrisdaimcc11
What are two different ways you could find the value of a? explain these methods.
Answers: 2
image
Physics, 22.06.2019 14:30, sross8799
Suppose that 27 j of work is needed to stretch a spring from its natural length of 6 m to a length of 9 m. (a) how much work is needed to stretch the spring from 12 m to 14 m? j (b) how far beyond its natural length will a force of 78 n keep the spring stretched?
Answers: 2
image
Physics, 22.06.2019 17:00, sajawalkhan148
What does the law of conservation of mass state?
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Since rods are about 1000 times more sensitive than cones (at 470 nm), they should be able to detect...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Geography, 03.02.2021 18:40
Konu
Arts, 03.02.2021 18:40
Konu
Arts, 03.02.2021 18:40