Aplaintiff sued an auto manufacturer for negligence after a car accident involving the plaintiff's car that was made by the auto manufacturer. sixty days after service of the complaint and 40 days after service of the manufacturer's answer that contained no counterclaim, the plaintiff filed a motion seeking to file an amended complaint adding a claim for strict products liability against the auto manufacturer stemming from the same incident. the statute of limitations for strict products liability claims expired one week before the motion was filed. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?

The court should: Grant the motion, because the amended complaint relates back.

i guess that visual aids present persuasive examples to what you are presenting, some factors would be theme (does it fit with the color, information, what you are presenting), size (can you see it, is it a big enough span of data/information), and overall look of the visual aid.

hope this : )

emily ruth's annual premium is $1058.50

step-by-step explanation:

emily ruth is a female of 27 years age purchasing 20 year endowment insurance with face value $25000.

from the given table,

for females, the age of a male 3 years younger should be used.

so, we have to check for 24 year male for 20 year endowment.

it is 42.34 for every $1000 face value.

for a face value of $25000,

it is 25 * 42.34 = $1058.50

∴ emily ruth's annual premium is $1058.50