Were is conflicting testimony in a court
case. a police officer claims that his
radar monitor indicated that a car
was traveling at 1766 kmin (llomi/h).
the driver argues that the rodar must have
recorded the relative velocity because
he was only going 88km/h (55mi/h).
is it possible that both are telling
the truth? could ondbelying? prepore
scripts for expert witnesses, for both
the prosecution and the datensc, that
use physics to justify their positions
before the jury. create visual aids to
be used as tvidence to support the
different arguments.