Industrialized countries have begun to look at sustainable forms of energy to use to replace more harmful methods, yet poorer countries are more likely to use sources that are cheaper and easier to access. in this context, which of the following would be a more likely option in a poorer country? biomass coal hydroelectric solar

The correct answer is - coal.

The poorer countries do not put a lot of effort to protect the environment and not pollute it. The main reason for this is that they are struggling with poverty, thus they choose no means when it comes to making more profit. This leads to the usage of cheaper and easier to access natural resources in order to produce energy, as they make the most sense to make more profit. From the suggested options, the coal is the most likely source of energy to be used in poorer countries. The coal is cheap, it is found in lot of places around the world, and it is found in abundance. It is also a very powerful source of energy, and that is exactly what the economies of the poorer countries look for.

this is an example of "committed" time.

committed time, as contracted time, takes need over essential and available time since it is seen as profitable work. it alludes to the time allotted to keep up a home and family. at the point when a man is commuting using committed time this individual may feel that the drive is an obligation to family, for example, strolling youngsters to class or driving a mate to work. contracted and committed time clients may feel that their commute could really compare to the commute of important or leisure time clients on the grounds that their commute is profitable work. in this manner, they might be more disposed to pick a mechanized method of movement.