Physics, 04.02.2020 00:43, chrischris1
Which statement would most likely explain why the results of one new experiment did not support an accepted hypothesis?
a. there was a flaw in the experiment’s design or errors when it was conducted.
b. two different theories about the subject are both true at the same time.
c. the hypothesis was false, and scientists should replace it with a new one.
d. the question that originally inspired the hypothesis was not fit for scientific inquiry.
troll answers will be reported.
Answers: 2
Physics, 21.06.2019 17:00, emmdolzx
Ajogger accelerates from rest to 4.86 m/s in 2.43 s. a car accelerates from 20.6 to 32.7 m/s also in 2.43 s. (a) find the magnitude of the acceleration of the jogger. (b) determine the magnitude of the acceleration of the car. (c) how much further does the car travel than the jogger during the 2.43 s?
Answers: 2
Physics, 22.06.2019 00:00, cchsemily7210
A1000-kg weather rocket is launched straight up. the rocket motor provides a constant acceleration for 16-s, then the motor stops. the rocket altitude 20-s after launch is 510-m. you can ignore any effects of air resistance. a. what was the rocket’s acceleration during the first 16-s? b. what is the rocket’s speed as it passes through a cloud 5100-m above the ground?
Answers: 1
Physics, 22.06.2019 11:20, loganfreeman04
If the radius of curvature of the cornea is 0.75 cm when the eye is focusing on an object 36.0 cm from the cornea vertex and the indexes of refraction are as described before, what is the distance from the cornea vertex to the retina? express your answer to two significant
Answers: 3
Which statement would most likely explain why the results of one new experiment did not support an a...
Mathematics, 27.07.2019 22:10
Mathematics, 27.07.2019 22:10
Mathematics, 27.07.2019 22:10