Name and describe one of the three conditions Dr. Natterson-Horowitz mentions that there have been well-studies by veterinarians, who might have insights to provide in diagnosing or treating those conditions in human patients.

One of the conditions that she describe   was induced heart failure, which is basically  a “broken heart.” She says that human  doctors apparently discovered that this is  true in humans around 2000. However,  veterinarians had recognized this in the  earlier 1970s. This just goes to show that  there are more correlations between the two  than people realize and could help  substantially.   Do you find Dr. Natterson-Horowitz's argument  that physicians can learn a lot from  veterinarians convincing? What part of her  argument is, to you, especially strong or weak?   I think that her argument is extremely  convincing and I definitely agree with her.  Her statements about how she performed the same functions on both humans and  other animals helped portray the argument  she was making but was also a strong point.  I also thought that her naming the three conditions was very strong

Explanation:

they should make the law strict.

Explanation:

Not to go outside. In some countries they are taking strict action for those who are going outside and allow testing for all without appointment maybe.