WILL GIVE 20 POINTS

You will now put your new knowledge to work in a case study. Pretend you are an audiologist, and you see a new patient who works as a concert promoter. He is complaining of hearing loss. Write a case study that includes the following components:

a description of how the patient approaches you, being sure to cover the role of different healthcare workers with whom he might have come into contact and samples of teamwork or collaboration between different health care roles;
how you assess him, including research and explanation of one or two of the tests above;
how you record the assessment;
your explanation of his problem, using both medical terminology and simpler language that he will understand;
your explanation of treatment or support options and their goals, based on research (which can be very simple, with no need to make an actual diagnosis, but rather explain a situation or behavior that he should stop doing);
a concern or issue that the patient has other than his diagnosis, for example, if the diagnosis does not fit his lifestyle, etc., and how you would communicate with him about his concern; and
an ethical or legal situation that arises from this case, and how you handled it.
This case study should result in a formal paper of no less than 750 words.
The assignment should take approximately three hours.
All your resources should be properly cited.

Females who lift weights are not going to develop large, bulky muscles because a. they have more muscle fibers than men b. they have thicker muscle fibers than men c. they have lower testosterone levels than men d. all of the above does not change length

You are assigned to care for david ramsey, a 22-year old male patient with back injury secondary to being thrown from a motorcycle. did nt damage the spinal, but the computed tomography revealed a compression fracture at l-2. david complains of severe back pain with numbness and tingling in the lower extremities. what assessments are indicated based on this nursing diagnosis? list other major nursing diagnoses based on david’s clinical presentation?

A10-year-old girl suffered from a rare malignancy in her brain and around her spinal cord. she had surgery, and most of the tumor mass was removed, but residual tumor remained in the brain and around the spinal cord. the girl's doctors informed her parents that chemotherapy and radiation were possible treatment options but could cause serious problems such as sepsis, a permanent loss of iq and stature, and even death. the parents wished to proceed with the therapy. while their child was undergoing aggressive chemotherapy and radiation, the parents did independent research and read of several drugs being administered for cancer in other states that were unapproved by the federal drug administration (fda) and were illegal in their home state but were touted by physicians using them as miracle cures." furthermore, one of the girl's doctors released the girl's medical records to another physician to get a "second opinion" without informing the parents. this particular physician is a member of the same country club as the parents. he happens to share facts from the medical records with other members who end up telling the girl's parents. the couple sued their child's physician for failure to disclose alternative treatments, thus depriving them of informed consent. the couples also sued the child's physician for sharing their daughter's records in violation of the girl's privacy. how should the court rule in both cases? did the child's physician involved follow the law? did he act ethically in either situation? explain your answer. under the doctrine of informed consent, should a physician be responsible for informing patients of all treatment options, even if some of the treatments are illegal or not yet proven effective?